Radu Rendec

GTK3 Legacy Behaviour

Starting with the very decision of discontinuing Gnome 2 and writing Gnome 3 from scratch, the Gnome developers have had a strange way of innovating. The early versions of Gnome 3 were barely customizable, with a lot of features that had matured and stabilized in previous versions being completely gone. Since that moment on, the developers have continued in the same manner, by radically changing or completely removing features, without any way of reverting to the old behaviour. They started making choices for their users, instead of letting the users choose by themselves. And they have been constantly insisting on this policy.

Luckily, users still have the choice of completely switching to a different desktop environment. Just like I did. As I had been using Gnome for a long time (and considered Gnome 2 a mature and robust desktop environment), the natural choice for me was MATE Desktop Environment, which I have been consistently using ever since.

However, the GTK3 library suffers from the same obtuse policy of limiting users' freedom, and recently many important desktop applications (such as Firefox and LibreOffice) have switched to GTK3. For users like me who don't want their desktop to start behaving differently over the night, perhaps one of the most annoying things in recent GTK3 versions is the default behaviour of the file chooser. This article mentions some popular GTK3 problems and the solutions to fix them.

Overlay Scroll Bars

By default, scrollbars are now hidden and appear on-demand, when you hover the mouse over the scrollable area edge. The problem is that they are rendered over the scrollable area content, hiding some of it. If you prefer traditional scroll-bars, you can switch back to the old behaviour by adding this to your .bash_profile file:



Show Directories First in File Chooser

By default, the GTK3 file chooser mixes directories and files in the list. If you're looking for a particular directory in the list, this makes it harder to find it. This can be easily changed by a configuration option:

gsettings set org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser sort-directories-first true

If you prefer a GUI, there's dconf-editor, which allows you to browse to /org/gtk/Settings/FileChooser, see a list of available settings and their allowed values and change them as you like.


File Chooser Typeahead Search

In previous GTK versions, you used to be able to focus on any file/directory in the list, start typing, and this would jump to the matching file/directory in the already loaded list. In newer GTK3 versions this is no longer possible. Starting to type switches the list to recursive search results matching what you typed. If you have a large directory structure, this is not only very slow and resource consuming, but also completely useless - because you end up with a dozen of search results from not only the current directory but also subdirectories at any level, all mixed together in a flat list.

Unfortunately, at the time of writing this there is no setting for changing this behaviour and the only way to fix it is to patch GTK3 and recompile. The patch is available in a custom ArchLinux package. I also built some custom GTK 3.20.6 packages for Fedora (see below).


File Chooser Single Click Selection

In previous GTK versions, you used to have to double click on a file or directory in order to choose it. By "choose" I mean pick that file for open/save and close the file chooser. This is not to be confused with "select", which means just moving the focus on that file in the list.

In newer GTK3 versions this is no longer the case. The new behaviour is to use single click, but even that is not consistent: * If the file/directory not selected already, then a single click will choose it as expected (or recurse into it, if it's a directory). If you double click on it (because you're used to the old behaviour), it will not be handled as a double click event. It will be handled as two single click events. The first one will choose the file/directory. And, mostly annoying, if the first click recursed into a directory, the second click will choose whatever is there (at that mouse pointer position) in the previously chosen directory. * If the file/directory is not selected already the first click will not choose it, it will just select it. The second click will choose it. Again, if you double click, it will handle two single clicks (not a double click), but the behaviour will be similar to the old double click.

Unfortunately, at the time of writing this there is no setting for changing this behaviour and the only way to fix it is to patch GTK3 and recompile. The change was introduced by a single commit, which can be reverted. The reverse commit does not no longer apply cleanly on GTK 3.20.6, but can be easily applied manually. I also built some custom GTK 3.20.6 packages for Fedora (see below) and you can take the patch from there.


Custom Fedora Packages

Custom Fedora GTK3 packages that contain both the typeahead and the single click fix are available in my copr repository.

Qt Looks in Fedora 24

OK, so I recently upgraded to Fedora 24. Not so many surprises, but one of the was that suddenly the scrollbars in all Qt applications used a different theme. Most probably not only the scrollbars, but those were strikingly different.

As a background, I'm using MATE Desktop on Fedora, with the TraditionalOk theme and Mist icon set. So normally my desktop looks pretty much like the default Gnome 2 desktop before Fedora 15 (when they decided to drop Gnome 2, because it had been discontinued upstream).

To begin with, Fedora 24 is at the transition point between Qt 4 and Qt 5. For this reason, older applications still use Qt 4, while newer have switched to Qt 5 already. And of course there are some legacy applications like Skype for Linux that are stuck on Qt 4. This is not a problem at all, but it may not be obvious to you (as it wasn't to me before I ran into this problem) that Qt 4 and Qt 5 have totally different configuration systems.

Fixing Qt 4 Appearance

  • Install the qt4-config package and then run qtconfig-qt4.
  • In the default Appearance tab, select GTK+ for GUI Style.
  • Click File - Save. That's it, you're done. Now Qt 4 applications are fixed.

Fixing Qt 5 Appearance

Quoting from the official release notes, Fedora 24 introduces QGnomePlatform, a Qt Platform Theme that aims to take as many of the GNOME settings as possible and apply them directly to Qt applications, thus enabling the Qt applications to fit more consistently into the GNOME Desktop.

So all you have to do is install the qgnomeplatform package and then suddenly all Qt 5 applications will start to look like your GTK theme. They will even use the GTK file dialogs. This is awesome.


udisks2 Mount Path

udisks2 is the package that (among many other things) is responsible for automatically mounting removable media under /media. Well, not directly under /media - it creates on-the-fly a new subdirectory with the volume label (or uuid, or serial number, depending on the mounted filesystem type) and then mounts the removable media in that subdirectory.

Starting with Fedora 17, udisks2-1.94, the mount path has changed from /media to /var/run/media/<username>, where username represents the currently logged in user. If you use the command line a lot (like I do), it's not very convenient to type all these path components (even with autocompletion). Perhaps the reason behind this change was to avoid mount point conflicts (and permission problems for filesystems that don't support UNIX permissions) between multiple logged in users. But I doubt that two (or more) different users can mount the same volume in two different places at the same time.

I created a small patch against udisks-1.94 that reverts the mount location to /media. The patch is trivial, it just disables the code block that calculates the path in /var/run. Fallback to the old /media location was already implemented.

Software RAID1 Recovery

Disclaimer: I am not responsible for anything the material or the included code/patches may cause, including loss of data, physical damage, service disruption, or damage of any kind. Use at your own risk!

Booting in RAID-only environments

The main problem with grub (and booting in general) is that it needs a plain ext2 partition to read the kernel image from. The device that holds the partition needs to be readable by using BIOS calls (we cannot use drivers at boot time, can we?).

RAID devices are internally managed by the kernel, so you tipically need a non-RAID device to boot from. However, software RAID 1 with linux is special, because the data is not interleaved. This means that if you have an ext2 filesystem on a RAID 1 array, you'll have the same data blocks in the same order on both members of the array, and thus a valid ext2 filesystem on both of them.

In this particular case it's possible to boot even if the /boot directory resides on the array. Because the information is duplicated, you only need one of the two array members, and you can use any of them to boot.

You should REMEMBER that this is just a trick. It only works with software RAID level 1, and in general you need a separate hard drive to hold the /boot directory and boot from it.

Tricking grub to setup and boot correctly

We'll assume that you have two disks (hda and hdc) with two partitions each. hda1 and hdc1 are equally sized, and members of the md0 RAID 1 array. Similarly, hda2 and hdc2 are equally sized, and members of the md1 array. The md0 device is smaller and holds the /boot filesystem, and md1 is larger and holds the / filesystem.

If you use anaconda at install time to configure the arrays, it will also setup grub at the end of the install process, and by some magic it will work. However, if, at some point in the future, the primary hard drive (hda) fails and you replace it, you'll have no boot sector to boot from. Eventually, you'll have to reinstall grub and, surprisingly, although anaconda managed to install grub correctly, you won't manage to do it with the configuration files created by anaconda. If you try to grub-install /dev/hda, it will claim that "md0 does not have a corresponding BIOS drive" and abort the installation.

The problem is that at boot time grub needs to read the stage1 and stage2 files, which are located in /boot/grub. But at boot time no kernel is running, so grub will have to use BIOS calls to read directly from the disk. However, it needs to know exactly what disk (and partition) to read from. This piece of information is determined at install time, and then hard-coded into the boot sector.

At install time the kernel is running, and some device is mounted under /boot. But grub needs to find what physical device that is, so it can properly read from it later at boot time. To do this, it first determines the device that is mounted on /boot, then it tries to figure out how it can be accessed through BIOS calls. Fortunately, it looks for the mounted device in /etc/mtab rather than /proc/mounts.

The /dev/md0 device (which is mounted on /boot) will never have a corresponding BIOS drive, because it's not a real (physical) device. It's a virtual device managed by the linux kernel. But the same information resides on both physical members of the array, so we need to trick grub into thinking that /boot is mounted from one of the two members (typically the one on the first disk - /dev/hda1 in our example). To do this, you need to edit /etc/mtab and manually change the entry for /boot with /dev/hda1 as the device.

At this point grub knows that /boot is on /dev/hda1, but it still needs a hint about accessing it using only BIOS calls. The hint comes from the /boot/grub/device.map, which maps a logical name such as /dev/hda to a physical device such as (hd0) which means (to grub) the first hard drive detected by the BIOS. So you need to make sure you have a correct mapping for the device you used.

Now you can safely do grub-install /dev/hda and it should work.

Recovery when the secondary drive fails

This is the easiest case, because all the boot data resides on the healthy drive. The system will boot normally, but the arrays will start in degraded mode.

You can replace the damaged drive, and the system will still boot, again with the arrays in degraded mode. Now all you have to do is create the same partitions (or larger ones) on the new drive as you had on the old one. Then you can simply "hot" add the newly created partitions to the degraded arrays.

Suppose the same example as in the previos section. In this scenario /dev/hdc failed, and you replaced it with a new drive. On the new drive you created the hdc1 and hdc2 partitions, which you'll have to add to the md0 and md1 arrays respectively. This is very simple, and all you have to do is:

raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/hdc1
raidhotadd /dev/md1 /dev/hdc2

Now you can watch the arrays being reconstructed by looking at /proc/mdstat. If you're anxious about the progress of the job, you can even watch "cat /proc/mdstat". Note that the two arrays won't be both rebuilt at the same time. That is because they both involve the same disks and rebuilding them at the same time would cause the disk heads to be moved very often from one partition to another. This would result in a severe performance loss and the md driver avoids it by rebuilding the second array only after the first completes.

Recovery when the primary drive fails

The first thing you should do is save a copy of your /etc/raidtab file. You'll need this later to get things to work. A floppy disk would do, but even better, make a hardcopy of the file. It's very small, but also very important.

The next thing you should do is replace the damaged disk. This is a bit tricky, because now you don't have anything left to boot from. Well, not really :) You can still boot from a rescue disk. So get Fedora disk 1 (or RedHat 9 disk 1 or... whatever) and boot in rescue mode (that's "linux rescue" at the boot prompt with RedHat & friends). Don't let the rescue disk mount anything from your hard disk. You'll mount them later.

Use fdisk to create partitions on the new disk. The new partitions must be the same size or larger than the old ones. Don't forget to change their type to 'fd' (Linux Raid Autodetect).

Now all you have to do is initialize the raid superblock on the new partitions and restore the arrays. But the only way I know to do this is start the arrays in degraded mode and then "hot" add the new partitions. The funny part is that anaconda won't start any array in degraded mode because "it's dangerous" (guys, why is it dangerous and how the heck are you supposed to restore the arrays first since they need to be running to add a new member?). Moreover, raidstart (and raidstop too) from the rescue image is some kind of anaconda "thingie" (actually a python program) that would never start the arrays. You need the original raidstart (the one from the raid tools package).

If your array is anything else but software RAID 1, you'll be on your own on this one. But if it is software RAID 1, you can do a nice trick. As I previously explained, the two members of the array are identical, and more, they are valid filesystems because the data is not interleaved. This means you can mount the corresponding "/" partition from the healthy drive as if the filesystem were created directly on the partition (and not on the RAID device). Use this very carefully and keep in mind that mounting the partition read-write is a very bad idea.

Mount the "/" partition from the healthy drive read-only and copy the raidtab file from it to /etc. Change the (newly created) /etc/raidtab file as if the arrays did not contain the partitions on the damaged drive. Remove the corresponding "device" and "raid-disk" entries, and adjust the remaining "nr-raid-disks" and "raid-disk" entries accordingly. Now you should be able to start the arrays (in degraded mode, of course) if you use the mounted partition's copy of raidstart. In our example, the modified raidtab file should look like this:

raiddev             /dev/md1
raid-level                  1
nr-raid-disks               1
persistent-superblock       1
nr-spare-disks              0
    device          /dev/hdc2
    raid-disk     0
raiddev             /dev/md0
raid-level                  1
nr-raid-disks               1
persistent-superblock       1
nr-spare-disks              0
    device          /dev/hdc1
    raid-disk     0

The original raidtab (in case you might need an example to write one from scratch) should look like this:

raiddev             /dev/md1
raid-level                  1
nr-raid-disks               2
persistent-superblock       1
nr-spare-disks              0
    device          /dev/hda2
    raid-disk     0
    device          /dev/hdc2
    raid-disk     1
raiddev             /dev/md0
raid-level                  1
nr-raid-disks               2
persistent-superblock       1
nr-spare-disks              0
    device          /dev/hda1
    raid-disk     0
    device          /dev/hdc1
    raid-disk     1

Now you can mount the RAID devices (this time it's safe to mount them r-w) and chroot into them. Use raidhotadd to add the partitions from the new hard disk to the arrays. Note that the RAID driver will synchronize only one array at a time, so start with the /boot array. You'll need it to be completely synchronized before you can boot.

Trick grub and re-install it, as previously described. Cleanly unmount the arrays, do a "sync" (just to be sure), and reboot. Your system should start cleanly.

Using a previously used disk as a replacement

This section should explain what you should take into account when using a previously used disk as a replacement, if it had RAID partitions on it (particularly this explains how to destroy the RAID superblock). To be written :)

Realtek 8139-C Cardbus

Disclaimer: I am not responsible for anything may be caused by applying procedures described in this material, including loss of data, physical damage, service disruption, or damage of any kind. Use at your own risk!

Background: I have recently bought a cardbus pcmcia Realtek 8139 card, and tryed to set it up on my RedHat 7.3 box. It works perfectly with the 8139too module, but the init scripts "insist" on loading 8139cp instead.

The 8139cp driver claims the card chip is not supported:

8139cp 10/100 PCI Ethernet driver v0.0.7 (Feb 27, 2002)
8139cp: pci dev 02:00.0 (id 10ec:8139 rev 10) is not an 8139C+ compatible chip
8139cp: Try the "8139too" driver instead.

After two hours of digging through config files and scripts, I figured out what really happened. Cardbus pcmcia cards are in fact 32-bit pci devices. That means they will be reachable through the pci bus (actually through a pci-cardbus bridge), and listed by 'lspci'.

However, pcmcia cards are hotpluggable devices. When the kernel detects a new hotpluggable device, it invokes an utility that is responsible for loading the appropriate modules into the kernel. The utility is provided by the "hotplug" package, and it is used for all the hotpluggable devices (including usb).

The funny thing is that cardmgr would never load the modules itself for a cardbus card, even if the correct manufacturer id (or any other identification means) is present in the '/etc/pcmcia/config' file. Instead /etc/hotplug/pci.agent is invoked to load the appropriate modules.

The correct module is identified through the pci id (two 4-digit hex numbers). The id is looked up in a mapping table, and then the module is loaded into the kernel. The mapping table is located in /lib/modules//modules.pcimap. In my modules.pcimap file there was a single line containing 8139cp followed by many lines containing 8139too. So I removed the line with 8139cp and... surprise! Everything worked fine.

But... the modules.pcimap is generated by depmod, and depmod is run by the startup scripts at every boot. My "quick hack" solution was to add the following line at the beginning of /etc/modules.conf:


That line tells depmod to create the file as "/tmp/modules.pcimap", so the real map file is not overwritten. That's all.

If you know how to make depmod exclude 8139cp from the pcimap file, please drop me an e-mail :)

Home ← Older posts